UPDATE: NJ Law and Public Safety Committee Unanimously Votes to Double Ban Specific Armor Piercing Round That Is Already Illegal


You read that right.

The New Jersey Law and Public Safety Committee voted unanimously to send a bill, banning a round of ammunition that is already banned, to a full hearing in the Senate.

As the picture above shows, the round is already illegal for non military and law enforcement personnel. Despite this fact, the sponsor of the bill, Fred Madden (D) , says that this law is necessary to keep these rounds off the streets. Of course, since these rounds are already illegal, if they're on the streets now, all that proves is that criminals do not follow the current laws banning their sale and possession.

Surely double banning them will stop their alleged proliferation on the streets.

And if not, I'm sure they'll go for the holy mother herself.

The legendary triple ban.

So rare that it itself is banned...

We will keep you updated on any new developments regarding this bill.

Become a member today to help fight back against this insanity.

Showing 5 reactions

  • Bruce Gordon
    commented 2016-09-14 22:51:54 -0400
    So, if it was already banned and then banned again …is that like a double negative whereby it’s now legal?
  • Berwyn Rodgers
    followed this page 2016-09-14 12:44:08 -0400
  • Larry Lawson
    commented 2016-09-14 10:54:55 -0400
    Good to see our legislators are hard at work doing the people’s business
  • Gary Darrar
    commented 2016-09-14 03:19:06 -0400
    There is no federal ban on this ammo, they tried many times but always failed. Anyone can still buy it but it’s scarce and extremely expensive. What it says on the box about who can purchase it was put on it by the company, not the government.

    You can buy some right now delivered to your house.
  • Bruce Eden
    commented 2016-09-13 22:50:54 -0400
    Need to publish, in the press or on Facebook, every name of Committee members who voted for it, and then accuse them of treason and sedition against the U.S. Constitution and Second Amendment. The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) has stated that:

    “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). Any judge or politician who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land.

    The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

    Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of New Jersey (or any other state),any judge or politician who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason.

    If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

    Whenever a judge acts where he does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821).
Join Donate Volunteer